Shute Harbour Marina Development Creates Waves With Local Environmental Group

The recent bogging of an excavator in Shute Harbour has raised questions for local environmental group Whitsunday Conservation Council (WCC) who are concerned any new development would cause damage to the environment and create safety issues for mariners.  
“First proposed back in the mid 1980’s, the long history of this location’s unsuitability to support a marina has become more obvious as the years pass by,” says WCC President Tony Fontes.
“This entire bay in its natural state plays a critical ecological function that supports tourism, fisheries and recreation for the region.
“Shute Harbour and its mangroves are critical fisheries habitat. And that the seagrass beds, still recovering from recent cyclones, are important feeding areas for endangered dugongs and turtles”.
Community group Save our Foreshore Inc (SOF) has also had long running concerns about this proposal.
SOF President Suzette Pelt, a long-term tourism operator, says “SOF lodged a massive public response opposed to the application which is not so much about a marina but more a real estate play hiding behind a marina.
“If it’s about a place to park a boat, we believe Bowen’s already approved marina is a safer, better place to develop a marina”.
SOF says the complete loss of public foreshores and access to waterways for people who have historically used the area for fishing, boating, businesses and general enjoyment of views to the islands and surrounding Conway National Park, is unacceptable.
“We are not even sure that the inner island resorts have thought about the high likelihood of increased murky water quality on their already declining fringing coral reefs. We know from diving operators that during other local coastal constructions, water quality declined significantly, impacting their operations”.
“The fact that Humpback whales and calves rest in the channel entrance to Shute and their importance both to the environment and tourism was not specifically raised in regard to increased boat traffic and boat strike and anyone who has been around Whitsunday waters and Shute knows they’re there.
“These are serious issues”, Tony Fontes adds. More recently, community groups monitoring Council’s decision making, were alarmed by the lack of due diligence towards community risks with respect to Council’s role in this proposal.
“Instead of taking the recommendations by the 2 local councillors with respect to road safety and infrastructure risks – like those occurring following the Hinchinbrook marina disaster - 5 Whitsunday Regional Councillors voted down the pragmatic recommendation that Council invite the marina developers to update on the development’s status and changes mentioned in their application, before approving another extension to infrastructure requirements.” Suzette Pelt adds.
“After the multi-million-dollar over-run in costs associated with the re-development of the Council’s Shute Harbour jetty the engineer’s report stated, “this was one of the most difficult projects due to the depth of the Shute harbour muds.”
“It would seem prudent that council take every precaution to protect ratepayers from the enormous costs involved when a project, such as proposed, fails either from weather or economic conditions.”
Meanwhile, Whitsunday Regional Council’s Director Regional Strategy and Planning Neil McGaffin said as part of the development approval process all environmental matters, on land and on water, were researched, investigated, assessed, and approved by both the Federal and State governments.
“There were no changes to the existing approval that Council voted to extend. The decision was a procedural decision to grant an additional two years to undertake the works,” he said.

‍

Previous dredging works that took place at Shute Harbour. Photo supplied

‍